Tag Archives: Wine Review

Wine review: Bonterra Vineyards 2006 Syrah Organic Mendocino County

I always scan the Costco wine departments for “Markdowns”.  On a recent trip I found Bonterra Vineyards 2006 Syrah Organic from Mendocino County.  It was $9.97.  I don’t know what the original price was but $10 bucks seemed like a good idea at the time.  I don’t know enough about Organic or biodynamic farming, at this point, to talk confidently on the proof of that.  I can talk about the taste and how it makes me feel, and how I am going to look into that, later.

So some technical stuff:

The Blend: 97% Syrah, 2% Petit Sirah, 1% Grenache

Aging: 18 months in French and American Oak.  44% New, 22% once used, 22% twice used.

Alcohol: 14.4%

Production: 6,500 cases

Price: $9.97 on markdown at Costco.  Normal retail is $17.99

On the Nose: berries, not a heck of a lot going on in the nose for me

The Palate:  The palate is a nice surprise.  Fruit forward. Dark berry fruit.  Cocoa, black pepper and nice strong tannins on the finish.  There is a fair amount of sediment in the bottom of the bottle.  I like to see that in a Shiraz/Syrah.

The verdict: 88 points.  There is nothing about this wine that I find out of balance or unpleasant, it would be a very decent daily drinker.

If this doesn’t sound like a glowing review, it isn’t.  But that’s not because I don’t think the wine is good.  I’m just guessing however you found this article, you’d probably appreciate the honest truth.  It’s good.  It’s something I would drink again, probably serve at a party, and will buy again if I see it in the $10 range.

Aging:

Wine Review: Starmont Merryvale, 2007 Chardonnay, Napa Valley

What is it?  100% Chardonnay

Where from?  Napa Valley

How much?  About $20… as tested $9.97 at Costco

Alcohol: 13.5%

Production: 25,517 cases

How was it made? 50% barrel, 50% stainless steel fermentation, 60% malolactic, with 8 months in 15% new French oak

I took a trip down to my local Costco to search for markdowns.  I have enjoyed Starmont Merryvale Cabernet’s so I was interested in trying out the Chardonnay, especially at the reduced price.

On the nose, crushed pineapple in heavy syrup.  I can say this with certainty because I was making a pineapple marinade for pork tenderloin yesterday and the aroma is very fresh in my mind.  Though it is not a very strong aroma, it is definitely present.  There is also a citric aspect to it, a slight lemon.

On the palate, medium bodied, maybe just a little bit on the light side of medium.  The fruit on the palate is Citrus, predominately lemon.   It’s smooth, the acidity is quite subdued.

The finish is nice, and fairly long.  Surprisingly long, tingly, tart and there’s a hint of creamy oak nestled in there as well.

My first impression was that I was not wowed by this wine, but I gave it a bit of time to open up and warm up and it really made a big difference.  It’s a nice, fairly light, crisp simple straight forward Chardonnay.  If you are tired of over oaked over buttery monster California Chardonnay, you will be pleasantly surprised with this effort.

Wine Review: Mas Des Dames 2007 La Dame, Coteaux du Languedoc, France

The blend: 50% Grenache, 30% Syrah, 20% Carignan

Alcohol: 13%

Price: $15-$20  as sampled $9.97 at Costco on markdown

Ratings: 91 points Wine Spectator, Tom Stevenson’s Wine Report rated it the “Number one value in Languedoc”

The Nose: Intense Thyme, Graphite, Minerality

The Palate:  More Thyme, Minerality, Meat.  After a few hours in the decanter the tannins and fruit started to shine through.  Tart spicy blackberry fruit, astringent mouth puckering tannins.  After 5 hours in the decanter the tannins have died down considerably, elegant smooth and not overly fruity, still a powerful wine.

The Finish:  Smooth, balanced, becoming more and more delicious with more time in the decanter

Wine Review: Carlisle Zinfandel, 2007 Russian River Valley Sonoma, Papera Ranch

Where from? Russian River Valley – Sonoma, CA
How much? $40
Alcohol: 15.2%
Production: 650 Cases

This next wine I’m reviewing is rather special. Wine Spectator recently put out a segment reviewing a few of these Carlisle wines – rating this particular Zinfandel 96 points, and a Syrah of theirs 98 points. Yeah…wow. Put it this way, this is the highest rating Wine Spectator has ever given a Zinfandel. Back in early February on numerous online forums, people were already speculating this bottle’s potential to be the next wine of the year on the annual top 100 list. Now I consider that more than jumping the gun a bit being just over a month into 2010 at that point – though I can certainly see how one could make the argument considering this wine’s rating, price, and desirability. It has absolutely everything going for it, except for one factor…its production (only 650 cases made).

Now I never expected to find this bottle at any retailer. I figured I’d have to track it down through an online distributor, or pick it up through an auction site. I hear Carlisle distributes very little, and with a rating like that, and only 650 cases made – I was convinced that what little bit could have been shipped out to any retailer in Arizona would be long gone by now. Fortunately, I was wrong. I made a trip into AZ Wine Company in Scottsdale for my very first time this week. I have to say, I was impressed. I saw several wines that I couldn’t find anywhere else. After walking through several aisles, and eyeing numerous bottles, I spotted the Carlisle Zin. At first I thought there was no way, this had to be another one of their Zinfandels, and not the recent 96 pointer. But after a moment on my iPhone, I quickly realized this was in fact it. Some how there were 3 bottles sitting right in front of me…and of course I purchased every last one of them.

I know I know, I keep going on and on about being fortunate enough to actually find a few bottles of this wine. Let’s get on to the review already right? Well here we go. In the glass this wine is a very deep magenta color with a ruby rim. The nose displays a beautiful floral bouquet with black raspberries, cherries, and a complex mineral element. Simply sensational nose, it really draws you into the glass. I took my first taste after just 30 minutes in the decanter and was shocked. For how apparently young this wine is right now, it was extremely accessible in such a short period of time. This wine will benefit from another 2 to 5 years in the bottle minimum.

This wine is a stunner. It’s powerful, but completely well-balanced. Like a well made, finely-tuned sports car – it’s running at 150 mph, yet incredibly smooth and controlled. Amazing concentrated dark semi-jammy fruit with ample acidity. White pepper sings across your palate in perfect balance with the ripe cherries and raspberries. The finish is long with beautiful fleshy tannins. It leaves your mouth coated with flavor.

After an hour or two, the soft jammy berries are in perfect harmony. Simply put, this Zinfandel may very well be amongst the pinnacle of its varietal. Certainly the best that I have ever tasted, and it’s only going to get better with time. 97-98 points is where I score this wine. This is what a Zin is all about, you’d be hard pressed to improve on this.

Ryan O’Connor

VISIT THE CARLISLE WEBSITE HERE

Wine Review: Lang and Reed 2007, Cabernet Franc, North Coast California

Alcohol: 13.5%

Lang & Reed 2007 Cabernet Franc

Price: $22 online, $15-$20 retail. In Arizona it’s available at AZ Wine Company

100% Cabernet Franc

The nose:   Pretty floral notes, sweet almost marshmallow like…  it’s true!  Smell a freshly opened bag of marshmallows sometime…

The Palate: Slightly creamy texture, bright acidity, not a heavy long lasting acidity.  It’s more of a youthful acidity.  The fruit is a sweet and sour cherry. Sweet like a ripe dark cherry but quickly transitions into a tart unripe fruit center.  Like you are eating the center of the fruit.  Chewy Wooly tannins which make your mouth pucker up a bit, squeaky teeth tannins I like to say.

The Finish: Pleasant and light little touch of herbs.

Conclusion:  For the price ($15-$20) it is a very decent Cabernet Franc.  I’m not blown away to the point of buying several cases of it, but I think I will buy several more bottles and lay them down to see how it ages of the next year or two.  I paired this wine with a nice big New York Steak, and a twice baked potato with loads of melted extra sharp Tillamook cheddar on top.  And finished with a big piece of chocolate brownie cheesecake.  The wine went great with all three. And speaking of a nice big steak why not check out my super awesome steak recipe here

Lang and Reed Website Here

Tim

Wine Review: Grgich Hills Estate, 2006 Zinfandel, Napa Valley

Grgich Hills 2006 Zinfandel

Technicals:

Alcohol: 14.9%

Blend: 95% Zinfandel, 5% Petite Sirah

Aging: 15 months large French Oak Casks

Production: 5,784 Cases plus 558 cases of 375ml bottles

Price: $30.99 at AZ Wine Company

The Nose: Raspberry and spice

The Palate: Tart, chewy, Black Tea

Finish: Juicy and mouth-watering

I tasted this wine at a wine tasting, so the sample that I made this review from was rather limited.  My reviews usually consist of consuming the whole bottle…half one night, and then the other half 24 hours later…Tim.

Wine Review: Grgich Hills Estate, 2005 Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa Valley

Technicals:

Alcohol: 14.7%

Blend:  93% Cabernet, 2% Merlot, 3% Cabernet Franc, 2% Petit Verdot

Aging: 21 months in 60% new French Oak, after blending another 18 months back in the barrel

Price: $46.99 at AZ Wine Company

Production: 14,520 cases (750ml) plus an assortment of larger sizes, including (6) 9L bottles!

Nose: Cherry Tobacco Licorice

Palate: Ripe Blackberry, black cherry, dark chocolate–I mean DARK chocolate.  Spicy Licorice

Finish: Lingering, silky smooth mouth watering.

I tasted this wine at a wine tasting, so the sample that I made this review from was rather limited.  My reviews usually consist of consuming the whole bottle…half one night, and then the other half 24 hours later…Tim.

Wine Review: Grgich Hills Estate, 2005 Merlot, Napa Valley

Technicals:

Alcohol: 14.7%

Blend: 98% Merlot, 2% Petite Verdot

Aging: 18 months in 30% new French oak

Grgich Hills 2005 Merlot

Production: 5,372 cases plus 835 cases of the half bottles (375ml)

Price: $38.99 at AZ Wine Company

The nose:  Not much going on with the nose, but for me that seems about right with a Merlot.  Little bit of black fruit, little bit of oak.

The palate:  The palate explodes!  The subdued nose is very misleading.  Full bodied bright plum. Not quite ripe plums.  Solid chewy tannins ala black tea, strong black tea.  Squeaky teeth tannins.  There is a little bit of heat on the back-end, not enough to be off-putting for me, but enough that this Merlot would pair well red meats.

The company literature describes this Merlot is a Cabernet lover’s Merlot.  I agree.  And I LOVE big powerful Cabernet’s.  I tasted this wine at a wine tasting, so the sample that I made this review from was rather limited.  My reviews usually consist of consuming the whole bottle…half one night, and then the other half 24 hours later…Tim.

Wine Review: Grgich Hills Estate, 2007 Fume Blanc, Napa Valley

Technicals:

Alcohol: 14.1%

Oak and aging:  6 months in neutral french oak

Production: 11,800 cases, as well as 1,385 cases of the half bottles (375ml)

Price: $26.99 at AZ Wine Company

Nose:  full blown sweet aroma of flowers.

Palate: Ripe juicy grapefruit.  The kind that you love to have for breakfast, nice and juicy, ripe, yet has enough acidity to make it tart.  There is a little bit of minerality which adds a nice bit of complexity.

Finish: Smooth soft and silky mouthfeel.

This will be a great summertime wine, or spring time in warmer climates.  Great afternoon wine, before dinner.  Maybe great at night after a hot summer day.  Refreshing, clean crisp but really not overly acidic.

I tasted this wine at a wine tasting, so the sample that I made this review from was rather limited.  My reviews usually consist of consuming the whole bottle…half one night, and then the other half 24 hours later…Tim.

UPDATE: I liked the wine so much I picked up a bottle and re-tasted it on Friday Night!

It's best to consume the whole bottle

This time around, with much more to sample I really noticed the lemon grass aspect as well as the ripe juicy grape fruit. I paired this wine with chicken fettuccine alfredo with diced pancetta and red pepper, topped with finely grated Parmesan Reggiano.

On Saturday afternoon I paired the remainder of the wine with a mexican style lunch. Started with a giant flour tortilla from Carolina’s, (who by the way make the best hand made tortilla’s in Phoenix) then spread Diced Roma tomatoes, onion and garlic, with salt pepper and a bit of lemon juice mixed in with shredded chicken sprinkled with a chipotle rub. Sliced avocado and cheddar, warmed in a pan to melt the cheese and flipped it once to get both sides of the tortilla a little bit crispy. The wine went VERY well with the spiciness of the food.

Wine Review: Wyndham Estate, George Wyndham Founders Reserve Shiraz, 2005

Wyndam Estates Shiraz

Wow thats a long name.  Wyndham Estates bin 555 was my “First” wine.  The first wine that I actually enjoyed beyond the effects of just the alcohol.  From what I remember, it paired well with Classico brand pasta sauce.  I haven’t had any Wyndham Estates wines in ages, I’ve been on a California Cabernet kick for a while, but I decided when I was at Costco the other day to give ‘ol Wyndham a try again…

Technicals (from the Wyndham website):

Bottled: July 2007

Aging:  One and two year old American and French oak for up to 16 months

Alcohol: 14.5%

Price: $12.79 at Costco

Wyndham Estates tasting notes are short and to the point:

Color: Dark Cherry with bright purple hues

Bouquet: Spicy Choc mint nose with lifted violets and vanilla bean

Palate: Dense ripe blackberry fruits with a  luscious mid palate and a velvety tannin finish

Here’s what I found:  Dark cherry color.  Spicy oak nose.  I did not notice any violets or vanilla.  On the palate it was big on the “Dense ripe Blackberry fruits”.  The mid palate was not as “luscious” but plummy and gently tart. I equate luscious with sweet, maybe I’m wrong.  There were some velvety tannins on the finish.  All in all this wine is actually a little more to my liking than say the Pillar Box Red which I reviewed a little while ago.  This wine is not as sweet, and quite a bit more subdued.  And it should be, it’s a 2005, it’s had enough time to settle down.  And just for old times sake I paired it with Classico Florentine spinach and cheese pasta sauce with a little added ground beef and served on whole grain spaghetti noodles with a side of sour dough bread with melted parmesan Reggiano on it.  Follwed by Hagen Daaz dulce de luce ice ream and frosted lemon cake.  I kinda freaked out on the sugar eh?

Review | Kunde Estate 2005, Syrah, Sonoma Valley

Blend: 96% Syrah, 2% Viognier, 2% Cabernet Sauvignon.

Alcohol: 14.1%

Production:  6,000 cases

Company Literature:  “Rich blackberry, mint, and chocolate…rich berry…velvety, plush mouth-feel and a hint of cedar.”

Nice aroma on the nose, can’t quite place it, I want to say blackberries but I’ve tried smelling blackberries and they don’t appear to have a smell, only a taste. Little bit of spicy oak on the nose.  The palate is dominated by juicy rich blackberry and milk chocolate.  I did not detect mint.  I don’t like mint that much, and can always tell when there is mint in something I am eating or drinking.  No mint here.  whew!  Love the mouth-feel.  Velvety is right.  I want to say its because of the Viognier, but at only 2% could that be?  It has quite a similar mouth-feel to the d’Arenberg Laughing Magpie.  But with a more earthy finish.  This wine is not over oaked, not overly jammy, not overly high in alcohol content.  All in all I’d say it shows remarkable restraint and it pays off with a wine that is ready to drink now.

Wine Review: Cameron Hughes Lot 146, 2006 Diamond Mountain District, Napa Valley

From the Company Literature:  “Deep crimson center with a  matching rim; A focused nose of blackberries and Cassis.  A pronounced mid-palate follows ripe, tender fruit, and notable acidity.  Tannins are firm yet balanced, displaying a full-body and dense structure…distinctive depth and viscosity provide a long, complex finish and fleshy mouth feel.”

Production: 980 cases

$22 online only

I had no idea what to expect from Lot 146 as I did not read the literature before tasting it.  I was impatient and only decanted for about 10 minutes before the first swirl.

On the nose blackberries and Cassis, yes.  The nose is not over powering.   The first sip was not what I expected and really surprised me in a good way.  I thought the wine would have been a lot drier.  Lot 146  was tenaciously sweet at first and so I let it breath another 30 minutes.  After it had opened up the sweetness had subsided to a ripe fruit.  The mid palate is definitely pronounced.  Powerful ripe fruit backed up by a Phalanx of tannins lead into a sensual and glutenous finish.  Lot 146 is sexy! The kind of sexy that you just can’t find in a $15 bottle of California Cabernet.  And now I know why:  Lot 146  was sourced from a $90 program. Good thing I bought 3 bottles!

TO ORDER THIS WINE CLICK HERE

Wine Review: Shingleback 2004 D-Block Reserve Shiraz

Technicals:

100% Shiraz, McLaren Vale, South Australia

Alcohol: 14.7% on their website, 14.5% on my bottle?

about $55 Fry’s (Kroger)

93 points, James Halliday Wine Companion 2008, Platinum award, Best of Class Gold Medal-2008 L.A. International Wine & Spirit Competition.

After 1 hour decanting, the nose was still fairly subdued.  Blackberry, black cherry.  On the palate very smooth, nice ripe blackberry and black cherry again.  I am getting a little tired of the over the top fruit bomb style of Shiraz, I am also getting tired of the massiveness of a lot of Shiraz on the market.   By massiveness I mean too much tannin too much oak too much alcohol heat.

Day 2.  24 hours later.  Superb.  Just a nice smooth extremely well balanced wine.  It’s not very complex but it is far more gentle than most of my recent Shiraz experiences.  Blackberries, I taste a lot of blackberries.  Just to make sure I went into the fridge and ate a couple of blackberries.  Affirmative, it’s blackberries.  Little bit of oak, no alcohol heat, a tiny bit of earthiness which I like.  I don’t like funky in your face earthiness.  I like the subtle kind of earthiness that if you breath out through your nose after a big sip, you can detect it.

Wine Review | Cameron Hughes Lot 121

Cameron Hughes, Lot 121  2006 Cabernet Sauvignon, Spring Mountain, Napa Valley

Cameron Hughes Spring Mountain Cabernet

1 of only about 5,500 bottles made

 

 

Alcohol: 14.2%

100% Cabernet Sauvignon

460 cases made.

Rating: 90 points Wine Enthusiast

$20

From Cameron Hughes Literature:

“…incredible fruit, colossal structure, gorgeous oak (80% new and 20% one-year old barrels for 20 months) and a remarkably supple mouthfeel for this district.  Deep purple red color and gorgeous nose reveal red stone fruits on the palate with plenty of tannin…’03 and ’04 recieved 92 points from The Wine Spectator and Wine Enthusiast.

I really have to agree that this wine is very accessible for the Spring Mountain District. The tannins are a little more laid back than the Spring Mountain Vineyard 2004 Cabernet that I reviewed a while back.  Equally delicious though, and needs similar amount of time in the decanter.  Minimum an hour, but two would be better.  I am always really interested in the story behind the wine.  Cameron always has a “Cameron Confidential” on his website where he gives you some clues and insights into the wine.  The remarkable thing about this wine is that not only does it come from the anonymous wineries $85 program but it is also the wineries entire production for 2006!

2nd Review

November 2010.

I made this!

After holding onto this wine for a year I recently celebrated the Weekly Wine Journal’s 1st birthday.  I went all out and bought a Kobe New York Strip to pair with this wine.  I also grilled some golden beets and carrots on a cedar plank, and also sautéed red onions and mushrooms in Worcester sauce.  This wine was an incredible pairing with the tender fatty juicy steak.  The bold chewy tannins were able to cut through the fat.  Absolutely fantastic!

 

Cameron Hughes, Lot 140. Cabernet Sauvignon, Chalk Hill, Sonoma, 2007

Currently this wine is only available at select Costco Wholesale Stores.

From the company literature: “…aromas of raspberry, Bing cherries, and roasted herbs, accompanied by delicate undertones of anise and hints of mint…vibrant mouth-feel and substantial tannins, the palate enjoys cocoa and cherry, with a distinct coffee finish.  Nicely balanced, with good acidity and well integrated oak…mid-palate is fruit-driven and lush, leading toward a more structured, textural finish…”

I decanted for an hour before my first sip.   I was in love with the aroma of this wine right away.  I really picked up on the raspberry and anise.  On the mouth a definite cocoa and cherry, ripe Bing cherry.  A little later on, the mint started to make a subtle appearance.  The oak is really well balanced, (there is no “Oak Monster” lurking in the bottle as Gary Vaynerchuk would say)  This wine is a lot more to my liking than the William Hill Estate Cabernet that I reviewed last week.  Lot 140 blends the pretty aromas of Chimney Rock Cabernet with the big fruit-driven tannins of Spring Mountain.  It’s everything I like about wine, all in one bottle!  Even more amazing is the alcohol content… 14.9%!  I had no idea it was that high, there is absolutely no heat present.  And here’s the kicker… it retails for $13.99 at Costco!  How can it be so good and so cheap??!  You can find Cameron Hughes Wine Lot 140 at select Costco’s in California and Arizona.

P.S.  (Dec 16th–just found out–total production on this wine is 8,000 cases)

Has anyone else tried Lot 140?  What do you think?  Go ahead and leave a comment!